首页> 外文OA文献 >Differential effects of biocide treatments on saxicolous communities: Case study of the Segovia cathedral cloister (Spain)
【2h】

Differential effects of biocide treatments on saxicolous communities: Case study of the Segovia cathedral cloister (Spain)

机译:杀菌剂对剑齿生物群落的不同影响:塞戈维亚大教堂回廊的案例研究(西班牙)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper reports on the differential elimination of surface lichen thalli and their penetrating hyphae and epilithic and endolithic cyanobacteria by two biocide treatments applied on a small scale to the cloister of the Segovia cathedral. Both chemical treatments were followed by mechanical cleaning, and their effects were determined by scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electron imaging (SEM–BSE). Both treatments were effective at killing epilithic lichens and cyanobacteria, although they showed different effects on endolithic microbiota. The cleaning treatment involving Biotin T, dissolved in water, applied to areas extensively colonized by crustose lichens, resulted in a cleaner stone surface that was practically free of surface epilithic lichen remains, but the presence of living fungal hyphae was detected in fissures of the stone under these remnants in samples examined two months after treatment. The treatment using Biotin R, dissolved in White Spirit, left more superficial lichen remains but was better at eliminating mycobiont hyphae penetrating the stone. Endolithic cyanobacteria from zones showing green and black colourations were also more affected by Biotin R treatment. Our SEM–BSE observations highlight the need for a complete evaluation of treatment effects, including those produced on both epilithic lichen thalli and their penetrating components and on epilithic and endolithic microbiota. The causes and consequences of the different efficacy of treatments observed, as well as the potential risks of recolonization by viable cells left behind after treatment, are discussed.
机译:本文报道了通过对塞戈维亚大教堂的回廊小规模应用的两种杀菌剂处理,差异性消除了表面地衣藻及其穿透的菌丝以及上石和内石蓝细菌。两种化学处理后均进行机械清洗,其效果由带有反向散射电子成像(SEM-BSE)的扫描电子显微镜确定。两种治疗方法均能有效杀死表皮地衣和蓝细菌,尽管它们对内生菌群有不同的作用。涉及溶解于水中的生物素T的清洁处理应用于由甲壳类地衣广泛定居的区域,产生了较清洁的石头表面,几乎没有表层上层的地衣残留物,但是在石头的裂缝中发现了活的真菌菌丝在治疗后两个月检查样本中的这些残留物。使用溶解在White Spirit中的Biotin R进行的处理,留下了更多的浅层地衣残留物,但在消除渗透到结石上的真菌菌丝方面效果更好。来自生物素R处理的来自显示绿色和黑色区域的嗜蓝藻蓝细菌也受到更大的影响。我们的SEM-BSE观察结果突出表明,需要对治疗效果进行全面评估,包括对上石器地衣藻及其穿透成分以及上石器和内石器菌群产生的效果。讨论了观察到的不同治疗功效的原因和后果,以及治疗后留下的活细胞重新定殖的潜在风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号